County roles and challengesThese notes are from the St. Louis County 2005
Commissioner Orientation Packet, prepared by the County
Administrators Office which includes an assessment of Minnesota
County Government by the consulting firm Himle-Horner.
Structure of St. Louis County
Note that most of the boxes on the lower half of the
page report to the County administrator, who reports to the
Board of Commissioners, who report to the community.
The Himle-Horner report lists perceptions of performance
in various roles by Minnesota counties, and challenges facing
counties.
Roles and perceived performance for Minnesota
countiesSocial Services: generally good performance with a
difficult and important role.
Public Safety: important, done well, could cooperate more
with cities for efficiency.
Environment: not done well, not a priority, not funded,
duplication with cities and state causes confusion.
Economic Development: not done well by counties, should
be left to cities and private sector.
Land Use Planning: best left to cities, collaborate more
with cities.
Challenges for Minnesota countiesMandates: external state / federal requirements that
counties provide certain services. Often not accompanied by
funding. Little room for flexibility.
Population Growth: strains services, aging population
shifts service demands.
Population Loss: may increase demands for services when
associated with unemployment, cuts in state aid exacerbate the
problem.
Regional Planning: Twin Cities counties and cities
required to produce comprehensive plans, outside that zone
comprehensive land use planning is very variable. This hinders
vision and long term planning, which can help save resources
and identify opportunities.
These roles and challenges are aggregated for the whole
state. How does St. Louis County compare? Are there factors are
unique to St. Louis County and Duluth?
These articles are retained on
the web for historical interest and do not necessarily reflect the
views or goals of DPPA today.
|